MoneyScience News |
- Blog Post: TheFinancialServicesClub: "There will be no poverty by 2035", Bill Gates [#SIBOS]
- Published / Preprint: Indifference pricing for Contingent Claims: Large Deviations Effects. (arXiv:1410.0384v1 [math.PR])
- Published / Preprint: Fair and profitable bilateral prices under funding costs and collateralization. (arXiv:1410.0448v1 [q-fin.MF])
- Published / Preprint: A generalized Dynkin game of switching type for defaultable claims in presence of contingent CSA. (arXiv:1410.0594v1 [q-fin.MF])
- Published / Preprint: Optimal strategies in collective Parrondo games. (arXiv:cond-mat/0212358v2 [cond-mat.stat-mech] UPDATED)
Blog Post: TheFinancialServicesClub: "There will be no poverty by 2035", Bill Gates [#SIBOS] Posted: 03 Oct 2014 01:30 AM PDT |
Posted: 02 Oct 2014 05:38 PM PDT We study utility indifference prices and optimal purchasing quantities for a non-traded contingent claim in an incomplete semi-martingale market with vanishing hedging errors, making connections with the theory of large deviations. We concentrate on sequences of semi-complete markets where for each $n$ the claim $h_n$ admits the decomposition $h_n = D_n+Y_n$ where $D_n$ is replicable and $Y_n$ is... Visit MoneyScience for the Complete Article. |
Posted: 02 Oct 2014 05:38 PM PDT Bielecki and Rutkowski (2014) introduced and studied a generic nonlinear market model, which includes several risky assets, multiple funding accounts and margin accounts. In this paper, we examine the pricing and hedging of contract both from the perspective of the hedger and the counterparty with arbitrary initial endowments. We derive inequalities for unilateral prices and we give the range for... Visit MoneyScience for the Complete Article. |
Posted: 02 Oct 2014 05:38 PM PDT In the present work we study the solution existence for a generalized Dynkin game of switching type which is shown to be the natural representation for general \emph{defaultable OTC contract} in which a \emph{contingent CSA} has been set between the parties. This is a theoretical \emph{counterparty risk mitigation mechanism} that allows the counterparty of a general OTC contract... Visit MoneyScience for the Complete Article. |
Posted: 02 Oct 2014 05:38 PM PDT We present a modification of the so-called Parrondo's paradox where one is allowed to choose in each turn the game that a large number of individuals play. It turns out that, by choosing the game which gives the highest average earnings at each step, one ends up with systematic loses, whereas a periodic or random sequence of choices yields a steadily increase of the capital. An explanation of... Visit MoneyScience for the Complete Article. |
You are subscribed to email updates from The Complete MoneyScience Reloaded To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |