Saturday, October 31, 2015

Women's Views on News

Women's Views on News


Remembering deaths in state custody

Posted: 30 Oct 2015 12:28 PM PDT

UFFC, silent procession, deaths in police custody, state care, inquest“There is a whole wealth of evidence out there about what the problems are.”

On 31 October 2015, the families and friends of those who have died while in the custody of the state will hold their annual remembrance procession from Trafalgar Square to Downing Street.

They will assemble at 12noon in Trafalgar Square and make their way in silence along Whitehall for a noisy protest at Downing Street.

Although they receive far less coverage than the sickening news of black deaths from the USA, deaths 'following police contact' are a major issue in the UK as well; 1,433 in England and Wales between 1990 and 2012, for example, according to campaigning group Inquest.

And not a single police officer has been convicted over any of them.

The United Families and Friends Campaign (UFFC) was set up in 1997 by the families who had lost loved ones at the hands of the state to challenge the injustice in the system.

It began as a network of black families because disproportionate numbers of BME people were dying in police custody, and has now grown to include families and friends of all races that die in custody.

The UFFC has held an annual remembrance procession every year now year since 1999.

The UFFC wants to see:

Prison deaths subjected to a system of properly funded investigation that is completely independent of the Prison Service;

Officers involved in custody deaths suspended until investigations are completed;

Prosecutions to automatically follow 'unlawful killing' verdicts;

Police forces be made accountable to the communities they serve;

Legal Aid and full disclosure of information made available to the relatives of victims; and

Officers responsible for deaths face criminal charges, even if retired.

This year the family of Sheku Bayoh, who died earlier this year in Kirkcaldy, will join the march for the first time.

The UFFC network includes the families of Leon Patterson, Roger Sylvester, who died after being restrained by police in 1999; Rocky Bennett who died in psychiatric custody in 1998; Harry Stanley shot dead by police officers in 1999; Sean Rigg, Habib 'Paps' Ullah, Azelle Rodney, Christopher Alder, Brian Douglas, Joy Gardner, Paul Jemmott, Ricky Bishop, Mikey Powell, Jason McPherson, Sarah Campbell, Jimmy Mubenga, Paul Coker, Mark Duggan and many others.

It was early morning when five men and women burst into Joy Gardner’s home, cornered and grabbed her, and forced her face down on to the floor.

They sat on her body, bound her hands to her side with a leather belt and manacles, strapped her legs together and wound yards of surgical tape round her head.

Joy Gardner was a 40-year-old Jamaican woman who died when police officers came to deport her.

Despite repeated demands from her family, campaigners and Amnesty International, there has been no inquest and no public inquiry into her death.

Leon Patterson was found dead in a Stockport police cell on 27 November 1992 . He was 31 years old, of mixed race and lived in North London. He had been arrested on the 21 November on suspicion of being involved in a till snatch.

Six days later he was discovered dead in his cell. During the last 20 hours of his life despite being seen by two police doctors he was left lying naked, his body covered in injuries, on a stone floor groaning and incoherent.

Neither doctor prescribed any medication or treatment nor took any steps to get him to a civilian hospital relying on the unsuccessful efforts of the police to get him into HMP Strangeways, Manchester. Likewise the police took no steps to take him to hospital once they were aware that the facility at Strangeways was not available.

The inquest jury returned a verdict of "Misadventure to which neglect contributed".

Roger Sylvester, an Islington council worker, stopped breathing at the emergency psychiatric unit at St Anne’s hospital, Haringey, when six police officers held him down on the floor for about 20 minutes, St Pancras coroner’s court heard. He fell into a coma and died later at the Whittington hospital, north London.

The UFFC’s annual procession is supported by 4WardEver, Migrant Media, INQUEST, BirminghamStrong Justice 4 All, Tottenham Rights, London Campaign Against Police & State Violence, LARAG, Newham Monitoring Project (NMP), the Pan African Society Community Forum, Defend the Right to Protest, Joint Enterprise Not Guilty by Association (JENGbA), the Institute of Race Relations, the Edge Fund, UNISON, the RMT, FBU, UNITE and UCU.

The hashtag for the event on Twitter is #UFFC17

This year the Home Secretary, Theresa May, announced the first ever public inquiry into deaths in police custody.

But remarking on this, Deborah Coles, the director of Inquest, said there has been no consultation with the families or with Inquest about the terms of reference, and the terms of reference were going to be critical.

There is also that sense of déjà vu, she told New International.

"In 30 years of our organisation's existence, there has been review after review, and there is a whole wealth of evidence out there about what the problems are," she said.

"The key issue is the fact that recommendations are not implemented."

Eaves closing

Posted: 30 Oct 2015 08:25 AM PDT

Eaves, ceasing operations,A charity known for its specialist services for helping and supporting women victims of violence.

It is with huge sadness that we report this: Eaves has announced that it will cease operations on 30 October 2015.

Eaves has been a member of the End Violence Against Women campaign – an unprecedented coalition of individuals and organisations set up in 2005 who are calling on the government, public bodies and others to take concerted action to end violence against women.

But Eaves has been operational since 1977 and is particularly known for its specialist services for helping and supporting women victims of violence.

These include the Poppy project, the London Exiting Advocacy and the Alice project.

The Poppy project has supported some 2000 women victims of trafficking since its inception and helped 45 women bring their traffickers to justice, obtaining combined sentence of 423 years.

The London Exiting Advocacy (LEA) project for women exiting prostitution was linked to unique primary research with 114 women and a specialist exiting prostitution training programme.

The Alice project has averted homelessness for 294 women this year – women with multiple and complex disadvantages including no recourse to public funds, mental health, benefit "sanctions", child custody, needing access to foodbanks and transport and basic welfare etc.

Announcing the closure, Eaves’ chair, Louisa Cox, said, "Eaves has done its best to ensure service users have other services to go to and we have been able to transfer some of our projects to other organisations.

"The quality of services and safety and well-being of our service users has always been our priority."

Outlining how Eaves reached this state of affairs, Cox continued: "Eaves has had to contend with high rents, project funding that does not cover the core costs so an increasing deficit and most recently the tragic illness, and subsequent loss, of our inspirational CEO Denise Marshall.

"We have taken a range of measures to diversify our funding base, increase donations, cut costs, move offices, but ultimately none of these steps was enough to save us."

Cuts, reductions and closures have of course hit a whole range of non-governmental organisations, however, there is much evidence to suggest that women are bearing the brunt.

Fair Deal for Women found that it is women who have paid off 79 per cent of the deficit to date.

It is more likely to be women in low-paid, insecure, part-time and public sector work, it is more likely to be women with caring responsibilities who may have to top up their incomes or rely exclusively on benefits and it is more likely to be women who need to rely on public, voluntary sector and specialist services.

Yet these are precisely the areas being cut.

But it is not purely and simply cuts that are at play.

It is abysmal commissioning whereby commissioners either do not know or do not care what they should be looking for or how to assess a bid other than by lowest unit cost with no regard to quality.

This is evidenced by the fact that large, generic, non-specialist organisations are winning tenders, expanding, accumulating vast reserves and specialist, smaller organisations with 40+ years of history with high levels of self-referrals from women (a sure sign of the value of the service to the women) – are shrinking and having to use their scarce reserves to survive.

The Independence Panel in their report "An Independent Mission; the voluntary sector in 2015" have been charting, since 2011, a combined attack on the voluntary sector.

They highlight gagging clauses, poor commissioning and threats to the distinctive identity, character and campaigning voice of the sector to name but a few.

The Big Society, transparency and accountability touted by the LibDem-Conservative government when they came into power, always had a hollow ring to some of us.

Cox said: "Cutting away and undermining accountability mechanisms and the independent voice, purpose and action of the sector is the completion of an ideological project to shrink the state, silence opposition and monetise misery.

"But both the staff and the service users at Eaves are resilient and determined.

"Even if Eaves is not there, the women who have made Eaves what it was are still there and still fighting," Cox added.

"The fight to end male violence against women continues and will be won."

Dealing with the past in Northern Ireland

Posted: 30 Oct 2015 02:58 AM PDT

Noerthern Ireland, CEDAW, UNSCR 1325, women's rights, women in NIOr ten ways to stop ignoring women and stop not dealing with the past.

The United Nations’ Security Council Resolution 1325 (UNSCR 1325) recognises the important role played by women in the "prevention and resolution of conflicts, peace negotiations, peace-building, peacekeeping, humanitarian response and in post-conflict reconstruction" the world over.

And the Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) calls on the UK government to ensure the full implementation of UNSCR 1325 in Northern Ireland.

But to date, this has not happened.

Any negotiations in Northern Ireland tend to be male dominated, and women are often side-lined – and the processes set up to date seem to suggest that the promise made in the 1998 Good Friday / Belfast Agreement regarding women having ‘full and equal participation’ in the province’s politics have long been forgotten.

The Haass-O'Sullivan talks, in  2013, and the ensuing Stormont House Agreement all cemented the view that women were being forgotten – and left out of the ‘peace process’.

But a report launched by the Legacy Gender Integration Group last week, with the title 'Gender Principles for Dealing with the Legacy of the Past', highlighted the shortcomings around gender when dealing with the past and recommend steps the government could take to address them.

The Legacy Gender Integration Group is an independent initiative made up of a diverse multidisciplinary group of individuals with different perspectives and affiliations. It is an initiative is supported by the Reconciliation Fund of the Irish Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade.

Ten recommendations were made in the report.

These are:

Gender Integration – the report recommends that a "gendered lens must be applied holistically throughout the process".

‘There are’ the report says, ‘clear gender patterns to victimhood and survival. The vast majority of those killed in the conflict were men. The majority of surviving family members are women. Women are a significant presence in victims' organisations in providing and receiving services. Moreover, one's experience of conflict and one's conflict legacy needs are heavily shaped by gender. Victimhood is gendered, as are coping strategies.’

The authors suggest that these different gender patterns ‘must be recognised… further explored and addressed in the conduct of that process.’

Process Orientation – the authors suggest that the ‘experience of victimhood and survival is enduring’ and recommend that ‘victims and survivors must be enabled and supported to engage with mechanisms to deal with the past in their own time.’

Empowerment, Participation, Ownership and Control – work undertaken by the Women's Resource & Development Agency in partnership with the Community Foundation for Northern Ireland and the National Women’s Council of Ireland over a two-year period aimed to distil and disseminate learning from the Northern Ireland peace process.

It used the framework of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1325 on 'Women, Peace and Security' as a tool to enable women in Northern Ireland and the border counties of the Republic of Ireland to talk about their own experiences, with a particular emphasis on post-conflict issues.

These workshops raised the issue of women feeling left out of the process.  The Gender Principles report recommends the resourcing of local support to instil a sense of trust, ownership and control of any process involving victims.

Inclusivity: Be inclusive and accommodate complexity – the report suggests that ‘Victimhood and survival are highly personal, complex, and gendered experiences. Hierarchies of victimhood fail to account for this complexity. They instead encourage narrow and prescribed accounts and categories of harm.

‘Recognising diverse, shifting, multiple and gendered forms of harm, victimhood and survival, is essential to the construction of an inclusive and gender-sensitive process to deal with the past.’

The report recommends setting up ‘fair procedures’ and recognising the complex needs of victims as a way of avoiding the pitfall of thinking that all victims have the same needs.

Addressing Structural Obstacles – the report highlights the multiple harm faced by some victims – including poverty – and recommends that direct and practical support is needed.

Holistic Approach – putting in place ‘services, supports and acknowledgement must be included as essential elements of reparations to victims’.

This point is about addressing the distinct and complicated needs of victims in a way which puts the woman at the centre, and having a suite of tailored services around her which she can draw upon as and when they are needed.

Giving Voice and Being Heard: Honour individual stories – this recommendation is about listening to the victim, to the full story she has to tell.

‘This type of testimony can jar, however, with fuller, richer and broader accounts of victims and survivors seeking to tell their stories and to be heard and that can provide important documentation of the facts about and impact of harms,’ the report says.

‘If a gendered lens is not incorporated in how a story is gathered it will impact the rest of how a case is addressed.

‘Official processes must be ready to hear, to honour and to document, in their diversity and complexity, the stories of victims and survivors. Done properly, such processes can counter broader dynamics that result in silencing women and victims’.

A recommendation in the report is the provision of ‘practical measures to this end’ as they are very much needed.

Macro Analysis: Be attentive to the bigger picture – as well as honouring individual stories, this recommendation is asking that ‘gender is both integrated into each of the themes as well as identified as a specific theme for investigation’.

Equality and Diversity: Value gender expertise and lived experience – the report recommends that ‘As a matter of priority, a specific group responsible for overseeing the integration of gender in to dealing with the past should be established.

‘Mechanisms for dealing with the past cannot be staffed and led in ways that reinforce existing gender and other inequalities’ it points out.

Local and Global Learning: Craft bottom-up local responses that draw on international good practice – ‘Local appropriate processes to deal with the past must draw on international learning, together with the substantial local resources and knowledge within the community and existing victims organisations’.

Two case studies covering murders on both sides of the religious/political divide are also included in the Gender Principles Report and highlight how the needs and circumstances of women caught up in the Troubles were – and are being – completely ignored.

The years since the 1998 Good Friday / Belfast Agreement have seen the Northern Ireland Assembly come close to collapse on many occasions, and substantial part of the negotiations around these close calls have been about dealing with the past.

Time and time again women have asserted their need to be included in these processes and time and time again they have been let down.

And there is nothing in the most recent Stormont House Agreement to suggest we are any closer to women being allowed full and equal participation.

Women's rights are simply not on the agenda.

And women who have suffered as a consequence of the Troubles will continue to be failed unless their unique circumstances and needs as women and as victims are taken into consideration and a gendered lens is used to deal with the past.

Friday, October 30, 2015

Teaching News

Teaching News


The new Teaching Ideas site is LIVE!

Posted: 29 Oct 2015 09:03 AM PDT

New Teaching Ideas

We’ve very excited to announce that our new Teaching Ideas site is now live! The site has a brand new design, which should make it much easier and quicker for you to find useful ideas and teaching resources!

The site now has large image previews of the resources, new filtering and sorting options… and plenty of new teaching ideas and resources!

As we mentioned in our previous post, some of the content of our other sites has moved to Teaching Ideas now. This means that we will be closing Teaching Photos, Teaching Appz, Ideas to Inspire and this Teaching News blog over the next few weeks. We hope that these sites have been useful to you in the past, but these changes will give us much more time to create new and exciting teaching ideas / resources for you!

Visit Teaching Ideas now and let us know what you think!

The post The new Teaching Ideas site is LIVE! appeared first on Teaching News.

Women's Views on News

Women's Views on News


What are ‘British Values’?

Posted: 29 Oct 2015 09:57 AM PDT

British Values, letter, David Cameron, A puzzled mother, Anne-Marie Ablett, wrote to ask David Cameron recently.

Dear Mr Cameron, she began. And continued:

My children’s school has asked them to undertake a homework project on what “British Values” means to them.

Although I’m happy to support them with their homework, I admit I’m struggling with the concept of “British Values” and what they are supposed to mean.

I want to tell my children that in Britain, we value our children because they are our future.

Yet under this government, 3.6 million children in Britain live in poverty.

Mr Cameron, as a direct result of tax and benefit decisions made by your government since 2010, this figure is set to rise to 4.3 million by 2020.

And you have imposed massive cuts on Children’s Centres, which were designed to help lift the poorest children from poverty.

I want to tell my children that in Britain, we value and protect our environment.

Yet, Mr Cameron, you are ignoring local government opposition and forcing fracking upon our country, which poses significant risks to our environment and risks poisoning our water supply.

You are also failing to protect Britain’s national parks and protected wildlife habitats from destruction through fracking.

You have cut subsidies for renewable energy, but continue to subsidise non-renewable and nuclear energy.

What kind of environment can our children expect to inherit?

I want to tell my children that in Britain, we look after the sick, which is why we have a free healthcare system, the NHS.

But Mr Cameron, our NHS is now in financial trouble, isn’t it. The NHS has just reported a £930m overspend in the first financial quarter of this year, and we both know that this is as a direct result of the actions this government has taken: short-sighted financial planning and sweeping cuts to the public sector.

I find myself wondering how long the NHS, free healthcare, and therefore caring for the sick regardless of ability to pay, will survive under your government.

I want to tell my children that in Britain, we value our education system.

But this year, your government introduced the most severe funding cuts to education in years, which has affected jobs, morale and subject availability.

Since Michael Gove was made Education Minister, our government has attacked and undermined the teaching profession, making greater demands upon our teachers while cutting resources and funding.

There have been hasty, sweeping changes to the exam system; my daughter worries whether her qualifications will mean anything at all once she leaves school.

I want to tell my children that in Britain, everybody’s right to education is valued.

But since you have become Prime Minister, university tuition fees have trebled and you have scrapped maintenance grants for the poorest students.

I now find myself wondering whether my children will be able to go to university at all, even if they are bright enough for Higher Education.

I want to tell my children that Britain values human beings over corporate greed.

Yet you seem on the verge of signing up to the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), which would give enormous power to multinational companies at the expense of consumers and workers.

I want to tell my children that in Britain, we value disabled people and believe that they too make a valuable contribution to our society.

Yet you have practically removed all of Britain’s support structures for disabled people.

In fact, because of your government’s violations of the rights of disabled people, Britain is the first country ever to face a high-level international UN inquiry into its breach of disabled people’s rights.

I want to tell my children that it is a British value to offer help and sanctuary to those who have nothing because they are fleeing war or persecution.

Yet we are now facing the largest refugee crisis since WW2 and the UK houses just 1 per cent of the world’s refugees.

Of 4 million Syrian refugees, just 143 have been resettled to the UK.

Furthermore, in 2010, the UK pledged to end child detention for immigration purposes, yet just last year, 40 children under 5 were held at detention centres in the UK.

I want to tell my children that in Britain, we value human rights.

But your government wants to scrap the Human Rights Act, so your government will be able to overrule the European Court of Human Rights, meaning far less protection for our people from human rights violations in the UK.

I want to tell my children that in Britain, we value our laws which are designed to protect our people and our environment.

Yet one of the first things you did as Prime Minister was remove and weaken many of our existing laws, benefiting business at the expense of individual people and our environment.

I want to tell my children that in Britain, we value freedom of speech and freedom to protest so that when good people make bad decisions, we have the voice and power to speak up against what is happening.

Yet what use is freedom of speech when the British government callously ignores even widespread opposition to its decisions?

What good is the freedom to protest when you pass laws to silence British trade unions and pressure groups?

There is no such thing as freedom of speech or protest when you make people afraid to speak out, Mr Cameron.

I want to tell my children that British Values mean being brave and kind, tolerant and inclusive, caring and sharing, honest and integrous.

Yet these are not exclusively British Values, Mr Cameron, and – it must be said – values which are hardly being demonstrated by the current British government.

These are values that are intrinsic to being a good person, regardless of nationality.

You don’t have to be British to be a good person. The reverse is also true: not all British people are good people, Mr Cameron.

When I asked my young children what British Values meant to them, their response was, “We are brave and kind and honest. We care and share. We look after our world. We care about other people. We look after babies and children, people who are sick, poor people, disabled people and homeless people.”

If even the youngest children in our society understand that these qualities are something British society should aspire towards, why doesn’t the British government?

A society is only as good as the way it treats its weakest and most vulnerable members, Mr Cameron, and I’m very sorry to say that I could not find any examples of my children’s “British Values” in your government.

Where do I even begin with the hypocrisy of trying to instil “British Values” into the next generation by a government who fails to lead by example?

Perhaps we are trying to teach “British Values” to the wrong people.

Thankfully, bravery and kindness, tolerance and inclusion, caring and sharing, honesty and integrity are being nurtured in the next generation, without the need for these values to be labelled as “British”.

Perhaps, Mr Cameron, you should spend more time in British classrooms, in the presence of our children and our teachers – you might actually learn something.

Then again, I rather suspect you are beyond redemption, she wrote, and signed off.

The reply she received from his office – and pictured above – is not really very enlightening.

Work rights for the terminally ill?

Posted: 29 Oct 2015 09:23 AM PDT

terminally ill, work rights, TUC, MEPs, European ParliamentTerminally ill employees should not be fired from their workplace.

Labour MEPs and British trade union officials have called for urgent EU action to protect terminally ill workers throughout Europe.

They are now pushing for the UK’s trade union-led campaign, Dying to Work, to be supported at a European level.

The campaign, intially launched in May this year, aims to ensure that terminally ill employees are not cruelly fired from their workplace.

The TUC's Dying to Work campaign was launched after an employer of a GMB member tried to dismiss her following a terminal cancer diagnosis.

MEP Glenis Willmott, Labour's leader in the European Parliament, said: "I was appalled to hear that a constituent of mine was threatened with dismissal when she told her employer that she had a terminal illness.

"What sort of society do we live in when employers treat their staff in this manner?"

The employee, Jacci Woodcock, took her employer to court and is now bravely fighting for more employment protection for others with a terminal illness.

The TUC wants UK legislation to include terminal illness as a 'protected characteristic'.

This would mean that an employee with a terminal illness could not be dismissed as a result of their condition.

Lee Barron, Regional Secretary for the Midlands TUC, said: "Some people are surprised to hear that someone with a terminal illness would want to work, but many people don't have a choice, they still have to provide for their families and pay the bills."

"Labour MEPs raising this issue at a European level is a great achievement.

"The TUC are committed to extending the protection of terminally ill employees in the UK."

Richard Oliver, the GMB’s Political Officer for the East Midlands, said: "I am delighted that we were able to raise this issue again at the European Parliament. Getting support from MEPs from across Europe really strengthens our campaign."

At the launch the campaign, Midlands TUC Regional Secreatry, Lee Barron, said: 'People often say that some things are right and left. Well this is not. This is about right or wrong.

'Too many people are being put in the appalling situation of fighting for their right to work whilst coming to terms with their terminal illness.

'This campaign may take time.

'But the morality of the cause cannot be questioned and the Midlands TUC, along with our supporters will keep on fighting for the rights, dignity and respect that terminally ill worker deserve."

"Labour MEPs are committed to taking EU action to support employees with a terminal illness," Glenis Willmott said.

"We want to ensure that employees with a terminal illness are treated with dignity and respect.

"This surely isn't too much to ask?"

Abortion: not just a women’s issue

Posted: 29 Oct 2015 02:18 AM PDT

Helen and Graham Linehan, men and abortion, But men rarely publically acknowledge ever having been party to an abortion.

Writer Graham Linehan has joined the campaign to legalise abortion in Ireland, highlighting the value of a male voice in what is often a woman-only conversation.

Earlier this month the Irish writer and director Graham Linehan joined forces with Amnesty International in the campaign to repeal the Eighth Amendment – the constitutional ban on abortion in Ireland.

Linehan produced a short campaign film called Chains, voiced by Liam Neeson for the latest of Amnesty International's efforts to decriminalise abortion in Ireland.

In addition, Linehan and his wife Helen have recorded a short interview for Amnesty International, talking about their own personal experience of abortion.

When Helen Linehan was pregnant with the couple's first child they discovered a fatal foetal abnormality which would mean their child would not survive much longer than an hour, and would experience great pain upon birth.

At the time the couple lived in England and were recommended by doctors to have a termination. Both Helen and Graham describe the experience as difficult, but ultimately necessary.

The Linehans have chosen to share their story now following their unsettling realisation that had they been living in Ireland at the time, Helen would have been forced to carry the baby to term.

The interview ends with Linehan calling upon Ireland’s politicians to treat the current abortion law ‘as the emergency it is’.

It is incredibly rare to hear a man speaking publicly about his experience of abortion, which is why Graham Linehan's decision to speak openly about what happened to him and his wife is so poignant.

In total, approximately 200,000 women undergo an abortion in the UK each year. That means that approximately 200,000 men have helped their partner to an unwanted pregnancy.

Some of these women will be experiencing tragic situations similar to the Linehan's. But for many of these women it is simply not the right time in their lives to have a baby.

While not all of these 200,000 women's sexual partners may be aware of the situation, and many women deal with it alone, thousands of women will go through the experience with a man by their side.

Men can provide moral support; accompany their partner to clinics or hospitals; and look after them while they are recovering, both physically and emotionally. For many women, this can be invaluable.

But these men are invisible; men rarely publically acknowledge ever having been party to an abortion.

Although women rarely admit to it either.

Last month, in an effort to tackle the silence around abortion, American activists Lyndy West and Amelia Bonow created the #ShoutYourAbortion hashtag on Twitter – asking people to talk about how their lives had been impacted by having an abortion.

In total over 88,000 people joined the conversation, and the campaign made widespread international news.

West and Bonow were acting in response to efforts to defund Planned Parenthood (PP), the US organisation that provides a number of services, one of which is access to abortion.

In Bonow's words "The campaign to defund PP relies on the assumption that abortion is to be whispered about".

In an article in The Guardian Bonow acknowledged that even amongst her pro-choice friends people do not talk about abortion: ” I live in a progressive city, I have a fiercely pro-choice social circle and family, I write confessionally about myself for a living – so why is it that I never speak about abortion in anything beyond an abstract way, even with my closest friends?”

This is common.

Indeed silence on abortion is very much the status quo.

Which is the reason Graham Linehan's entry into the debate, now, is important.

Because for things to change – both in Ireland and the UK – men need to recognise that abortion rights are relevant to them as well.

Men should not want their girlfriends, wives, sisters, or female friends to suffer harassment when they walk into a clinic or hospital where terminations are practiced.

In the case of Ireland there are undoubtedly thousands of Irish men who do not wish the women they care about to undergo the traumatic experience of travelling to England for a termination they deem is necessary. Or, even worse, be forced to carry on with a pregnancy knowing full well the baby is not going to survive. Or dying themselves.

Ultimately, a woman's choice to have an abortion lies entirely with her. But that doesn't mean she has to do it alone. She didn't get pregnant by herself.

On average about 10 women a day travel from Ireland to the UK to have an abortion. An experience that is gruelling, financially and emotionally difficult and ultimately something they should not have to go through.

If more men follow in Graham Linehan’s footsteps and talk freely about their personal experience of abortion it too will help to reduce the unnecessary stigma which surrounds the topic.

It will also help to increase pressure on the Irish Government to enact the changes it so desperately needs to.

Thursday, October 29, 2015

Women's Views on News

Women's Views on News


What if we level the playing fields

Posted: 28 Oct 2015 06:37 AM PDT

what if... campaign, women in sport, girls, media, crowdfunderWe want to persuade the media to pledge to present sport to girls in a responsible way.

What if….

…instead of growing up only seeing images of models and make-up on the pages of magazines, young girls saw more sport portrayed in a way that made them want to be more physically active?

What if, just by making sport an everyday part of a girl’s world, we could change her perceptions of what she can achieve?

How amazing would that be?

Right now, girls and women are being left on the sidelines of sport from a young age, with 2 million fewer women than men playing sport each week.

Girls become less active from the age of 8; by 14 years old, only 1 in 10 girls meet the official guidelines for physical activity.

That means many of our sisters, daughters, granddaughters and friends are missing out on the numerous physical and mental health benefits that being active brings.

Is it any wonder girls are missing out when sport is practically invisible in their daily lives?

Take a look at the magazines, the adverts, the media that cater to girls: where are the sportswomen, the people they can look up to and think ‘yes, me too’?

Why should it only be celebrities, diets, fashion and make-up they’re exposed to?

Where is the positive portrayal of strong bodies from sport to sit alongside those other lifestyle images?

It’s not this way for boys.

For most young boys, sport is presented by media as something exciting, aspirational and accessible.

It’s time to level the playing field.

Women in Sport is a registered charity working to transform sport for the benefit of every woman and girl in the UK.

We are working from within to change the way that sport is delivered, giving women and girls the opportunity to make their mark across all areas of sport – from the field of play to the boardroom, from early years and throughout their life.

We want to make sport fairer and create a future where anyone can fulfil their potential through sport – regardless of gender.

We want to make sport more visible to girls.

The media has huge influence on the way girls see the world, so we want to show the media the impact that their portrayal of sport has on young girls, and the role that they can play in promoting healthy ideals; we want to challenge them to make changes.

The role of our crowdfunder is to build a powerful campaign that persuades media to pledge to present sport in a responsible way to girls through their pages.

We believe publishers of girls’ magazines and digital media have a duty to help make sport normal for them by bringing positive images, messages and role models to their readers.

By backing our campaign today, you will be helping girls everywhere grow up into healthy, active and body confident women.

You will be part of a movement that helps turn girls in sport from invisible into invincible.

Insight is at the heart of everything Women in Sport do.

Reaching our stage 1 fundraising target will enable us to gather the research and evidence needed to build a compelling case for change.

Your support will allow us to:

Research and review the way sport is portrayed to girls in their media, along with the ways women’s sport is presented;

Gather insight on the way sport reaches girls through media channels and the impact on young girls’ body confidence of negative portrayals of women’s sport;

Develop the right actions that will allow us to influence and change the way the media portrays sport, to give girls everywhere the best chance of growing up with a healthy perspective on sport and physical activity.

Reaching our stage 2 fundraising target will give us the means to campaign for the creation of a new way for media to help the next generation of girls to be the healthiest, fittest and happiest ever.

We will be able to launch a targeted and powerful campaign that challenges the media to consider the role and impact that their portrayal of sport has on young girls.

We will campaign to:

Gain commitment from all major UK media outlets in a girl’s world to present and promote a positive and responsible image of sport, particularly women’s sport and women playing sport;

Challenge major brands to consider their role in bringing sport to girls and to commit to portraying sport and women playing sport responsibly to girls; and

Use Women’s Sport Week in June 2016 to raise awareness and put pressure on media to provide positive and relatable portrayals of sport responsibly to girls.

What if … instead of growing up only seeing images of models and make-up on the pages of magazines, young girls saw more sport portrayed in a way that made them want to be more physically active?

We would like to see them see that…

Alaa Murabit on women, peace and security

Posted: 28 Oct 2015 06:12 AM PDT

Alaa Murabit, Women, Peace and Security, UNSCR 1325"If everyone didn't give them so many weapons, wouldn't it be harder for them to have a war?"

Dr Alaa Murabit, 25, is the founder of the Voice of Libyan Women, a women’s empowerment and development organization which focuses on women, peace and security through both practical on-the-ground measures as well as legal and policy change.

She addressed the United Nations Security Council Open Debate on Women, Peace and Security earlier this month, as one of three civil society guest speakers.

Mr. Prime Minister, Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen, fellow members of civil society, thank you for the opportunity to address this historical session, she began.

And continued:

As a child, my mother told me she always saw everything, courtesy of the two extra eyes she had in the back of her head. I made many attempts to disprove her, and needless to say, I was caught every time.

What I didn't know then was that my mother had just taught me a valuable lesson that I would use daily as a peace and security advocate: that the very women who lead families and societies know first, and best, what is happening in them and how to address it.

My organization, The Voice of Libyan Women, launched its first national project, the "Libyan Women's charter", in 2011.

In the midst of revolutionary euphoria, we spoke with thousands of women who expressed their excitement for the potential opportunities that awaited them.

But even then, they recognized and spoke of the challenges. Of how tensions would grow if transitional justice and reconciliation were not sought through legitimate structures, of the growing security risk of the open Sahara border, and of their increasing exclusion from the political arena.

They listed their priorities with clarity and purpose: to get "the weapons out of our homes" and their family members back to work.

As history has since proven, their words were the truest reflection of the impact of unaddressed conflict and increasing insecurity.

But women did not just speak.

As men vied for power or property, it was women who began to piece the country back together. It was women who, in record numbers founded organizations and initiatives, and through education, media, or political reform, were fighting for a truly "free" Libya.

Over the next three years, women were the first to feel the effects of ongoing fighting and the first to notice the signs of rising extremism.

In fact, as early as 2012, they warned of the increasing danger in driving alone, the increasing calls for school segregation and of how religious manipulation was being promoted by religious and political leaders to polarize their societies.

It was on this basis that my organization launched "The Noor Campaign," led by women and built on their partnership with men and religious actors to build peace and security in Libya.

By leveraging the strengths of the women in our national network – their ideas, community credibility, unparalleled networks and influence – we were able to reach communities, men and boys in particular, in staggering numbers, enlisting them as our partners in countering extremist messaging and preventing violence.

As a member of the 1325 Global Study Advisory Board I can tell you, our experience in Libya is not unique.

In conflict and post-conflict countries around the world, women are seen as less threatening politically and economically, garnering more societal trust than their male peers.

In fact, the importance of including women seems to be a glaringly obvious strategy.

As recent events have made clear, extremist organizations not only recognize women's agency, but they are extremely effective at speaking to and working with women for their own advantage, to the detriment of global peace and security.

We know how much the Women, Peace and Security agenda needs the continued commitment of the United Nations.

This is an undeniable fact.

However, a less admitted truth is that the United Nations and its Member States are not meeting the expectations of the global community, and that is because they continue to ignore the one tool that has never been more urgent for us to utilize: the participation of women.

The ongoing peace process in Colombia, for example, has so much to teach us.

After over 60 years of war and countless peace processes – all exclusive and all failed – the political process opened up with the help of the United Nations and Norway's mediation.

Both sides brought victim's voices and experiences to the negotiating table, 60 per cent of whom were women and they humanized the war, mobilizing their communities to support the peace talks.

I wish we had a civil society representative from Colombia here today, to show us what gains can be made when the United Nations and member states work together to ensure inclusive peace processes.

From my own experience in Libya, I know the only reliable requirement for admission to peace talks is a gun.

The lack of actionable commitment – by the UN and its Member States – to women, peace and security beyond these walls only validates those who exclude women from these negotiations.

The United Nations must prioritize the inclusion of women at home.

A few years ago, religious and political actors met with members of the international community in Libya to discuss transitional justice and rising city and tribal tensions.

As they were seated, one of the international representatives thanked the Libyan counterparts for attending.

Noting the low number of women in attendance, he then asked, "Where are the women?"

His Libyan counterpart looked around and replied with a laugh, "Well, where are yours?"

Women's inclusion is paramount to global stability, and our action on the ground needs to reflect our commitments on paper.

I would like to make three recommendations, based on the extensive work of myself and my civil society colleagues working on women, peace and security globally.

First, conflict prevention is paramount to ensuring global peace and security. Rather than only reactively addressing erupting conflicts and adopting overly militarized "band aid" responses which promote, rather than diffuse, local conflicts, the United Nations, Member States and the Security Council should instead address the underlying drivers of conflict. Resources, expertise and influence should be concentrated on the prevention and mitigation of conflict.

This means focusing on: justice, global disarmament, effective economic policy, representative political structures, accountable media and social reform.

The participation of women is critical in the prevention of conflict.

Women already engage in unofficial prevention practices in their community, and this should be recognized and institutionalized into official early warning systems and programs.

And the engagement of women cannot continue to be one of convenience, where women are only included to implement processes that the United Nations and Member States have decided in their absence.

Women be engaged in the very onset, at the decision and policy making level.

The “Countering Violent Extremism” agenda, for example, is a militarized one and does not prioritize addressing the root causes.

The aim of women peace activists is to prevent violent extremism in the first place.

Second, we urgently need a mechanism to address crisis situations.

Emergencies are not gender neutral.

Research has proven they disproportionately affect women and girls, often assaulted, exploited and abused for personal and economic gain.

Women's rights are violated as they are forced into marriage by armed groups, forced into religious conversion, and women's rights activists are targeted for violence for their own activism, or for that of male family members.

While there have been increased efforts to ensure more effective gender programming by organizations and Member States alike, they are uncoordinated, unenforced and insufficient.

The United Nations needs to create an accountable and authoritative "first response" structure within the Security Council, such as an informal expert group, which will guarantee greater coordination throughout the multilateral system and provide greater relief to women's rights defenders who are at risk on the ground.

Finally, there is an inarguable need to allocate adequate resources and increase the financial commitments made to women, peace and security.

This must be accompanied by the removal of structural, political and bureaucratic barriers that limit the accessibility of funds and resources to activists on the ground.

Dedicated contributions specific to programmes, led by women, which address the distinct needs of women in conflict and post-conflict environments are vital.

There is no doubt that United Nations Security Council Resolution 1325 was a tipping point for the global community and the women, peace and security agenda, opening doors and shifting the political discourse.

I'm of the new generation of women peace activists – from a country that was under dictatorship 15 years ago – but the 1325 agenda proved to be relevant to me and no doubt will be to women and societies in other countries.

But we cannot forget that it was the relentless leadership of civil society activists, veterans of the struggle for peace, that ensured the adoption of this very resolution 15 years ago.

And we are not backing down.

Every day we put our lives on the line and do our part for peace.

It is time for the United Nations and Member States to do theirs.

Only by partnering with women and civil society organizations on the frontlines can we counter the rising threats of insecurity: be it extremism, resource exploitation, mass migration, global warming and any of the myriad causes of conflict.

It is time we shift our support back to where it matters most: women.

When the Security Council finds it unthinkable to address a crisis without addressing women's rights; when humanitarian responders have full funding for their gender-specific services; when women grassroots leaders find their work fully funded and politically supported; when it is unimaginable that peace talks be held without women's full engagement: only then will the full potential of 1325 be realized.

And she ended her speech with a polite ‘thank you’.

A few weeks prior to the Open Debate, she wrote the following opinion piece:

"My younger sister, with the common sense only children have, asked me about the Syrian conflict years ago: "If everyone didn't give them so many weapons, wouldn't it be harder for them to have a war?"

The short answer is of course, "Yes."

Report on household food insecurity out

Posted: 28 Oct 2015 05:07 AM PDT

fabian commision, househod food insecurity, report, hunger, UKParents – usually mothers – are going hungry to feed their children.

Following 12 months of consultation, the Fabian Commission on Food and Poverty launched its final report, which sets out a clear plan for a fairer food system and short, medium and long-term actions to ensure that everybody has secure access to nutritious, affordable food.

Drawing on public hearings, expert testimony and the insights of people with experience of managing poverty, the Commission has uncovered a crisis of food access for many households in the UK.

There are multiple cases of parents – usually mothers – going hungry to feed their children or having to prioritise calories over nutrients to afford their weekly food shop.

Many people are feeling a deep sense of anxiety from the struggle to manage serious squeezes in household budgets that arises from the cost of living rising faster than income.

The Commission defines this state of living as 'household food insecurity': the inability to acquire or consume an adequate quality or sufficient quantity of food in socially acceptable ways, or the uncertainty that one will be able to do so.

But a lack of official measurement means nobody can be clear how many people are affected by household food insecurity in the UK.

Reducing and eventually ending household food insecurity needs an active approach from government to tackle its structural drivers, and the Commission have produced a 14-point plan for how the government can create a food system that works for people on and near the breadline.

The commissioners' recommendations include:

A new cross-departmental minister with responsibility for eliminating household food insecurity in the UK;

Action to reduce acute household food insecurity caused by social security benefit sanctions, delays and errors;

An inquiry to identify effective ways of removing poverty premiums for key living costs including food, utilities, housing, household appliances, and transport;

Local authorities establish food access plans that will address any physical barriers to affordable, nutritious food in their area;

A pilot tax on sugary drinks so that the efficacy of taxes on unhealthy food and drink can be assessed; and

A review of current advertising codes to identify where existing rules are being flouted and children are being bombarded by unhealthy promotions;

To read the full report, click here.

Wednesday, October 28, 2015

Women's Views on News

Women's Views on News


Cleaners’ rights campaign launched

Posted: 27 Oct 2015 05:42 AM PDT

cleaners' right campaign launched, ECHR, taskforce, materialIndustry taskforce unveils campaign to improve the working conditions of cleaners.

A campaign to promote good working conditions in the cleaning industry has been launched by an industry-led taskforce set up by the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC).

The Equality and Human Rights Commission is a statutory body established under the Equality Act 2006. It operates as an independent body to protect and promote equality and human rights in Great Britain.

It aims to encourage equality and diversity, eliminate unlawful discrimination, and promote and protect human rights.

The Commission enforces equality legislation on age, disability, gender reassignment, marriage and civil partnership, pregnancy and maternity, race, religion or belief, sex, sexual orientation.

It encourages compliance with the Human Rights Act 1998 and is accredited by the UN as an 'A status' National Human Rights Institution.

The industry-led taskforce behind this new campaign, and which is chaired by the EHRC’s deputy chair Caroline Waters, includes leading businesses, trade associations and trade unions.

The Commission convened the taskforce following publication of its report  called ‘The Invisible Workforce: employment practices in the cleaning sector’.

The Commission launched a project to examine employment practices in the cleaning sector in England, Scotland and Wales in September 2013; the EHRC wanted to understand how employers comply with their equality obligations in the work place and respect human rights.

The focus was on standardised, non-domestic cleaning in the office, health, retail, transport and leisure sectors as these are the four largest users of cleaning services and the findings were published in August 2014.

This set out the findings on employment practices in the commercial cleaning sector in England, Scotland and Wales.

The report found many examples of good practice.

These included cleaning firms with policies in place to promote equality and also clients who enter into longer-term contracts. These help firms to develop positive relationships with suppliers and also encourage investment in workforce development, leading to greater job stability.

The report also found that some employers did not provide contracts to staff – and that employers some failed to pay their employees in full, or to pay sickness or holiday leave entitlements.

Many cleaning operatives are female migrants who spoke of being 'invisible', of being treated badly compared to other employees, and said they did not understand their rights.

To solve these problems the taskforce has developed some ‘principles for responsible procurement’, the purpose of which is to encourage clients who buy in cleaning services to consider the impact of procurement on the employment practices of ‘cleaning providers’.

The taskforce also developed a poster to highlight the value of cleaning operatives, and Your Rights at Work postcards for cleaning firms to send to their employees explaining their employment rights.

All of the materials can be downloaded from the Commission's website.

Caroline Waters said: "The Commission's role is to promote and enforce the laws that protect our rights to fairness, dignity and respect.

"It has been a great privilege to have worked over the past year or so with so many people who are committed to improving the working conditions of cleaning operatives," she continued.

"It is fantastic that taskforce members drawn from across business, industry, trade associations, government, voluntary bodies and trade unions have come together with their thoughts, ideas and energy, and with a real appetite for tackling the problems our original report revealed.

"We very much hope the tools we have now produced will help to bring real and lasting change for commercial cleaning operatives."

For, as UNISON's Michelle Singleton, wrote, 'The initial research established what many of us have suspected for some time, that despite many areas of good practice, cleaners are still a largely invisible workforce and can be subject to some of the worst employment practices and human rights abuses in the UK .

'Key issues for all of us such as fairness, dignity and respect were all recurring themes for dissatisfaction amongst the workers in this sector.

'The cleaning sector has been ignored for too long and this work will go a long way to highlight issues in the sector and to raise the profile of cleaners in the workplace.'

Open letter to the governments of Europe

Posted: 27 Oct 2015 05:29 AM PDT

open letter, governments of Europe, front-line volunteers, winter, help“What are you going to do to prevent suffering and death among refugees?”

Over 90 volunteer groups from the UK, Ireland and 'mainland Europe' have sent an open letter to the governments of Europe calling for immediate and decisive action to alleviate the appalling situation the refugees from war zones currently on European soil are faced with – particularly in view of the imminent serious problem of wintertime.

In their open letter to the governments of Europe they say:

‘We, the front-line volunteers who for months now have been helping thousands of refugees, call on all the governments of Europe to act immediately and decisively to alleviate the situation.

There are tens of thousands of people moving through south-eastern Europe and the current capacities of volunteer-based help sites are seriously challenged.

Given also the rapid approach of winter and problems at various borders, we feel there is a real danger that the situation will lead to serious medical problems and likely deaths among the refugee community.

Every person has the legal right to seek asylum.

If Europe is not able to provide safe and legal routes for asylum-seekers, it is obliged to provide aid to those who took the dangerous route.

We do not want to see a single refugee dying while waiting in endless queues at European borders, literally in our own hands.

Volunteers have been providing a wide range of activities so far, in many places completely replacing the absent government facilities and aid.

We are distributing food and water, undertaking crowd management, providing critical information about registration and borders, referring vulnerable people to UNHCR or medical services, caring for children, managing stocks of clothing and blankets, cleaning waste, raising funds and providing shelter to the most vulnerable few.

We have been doing all this for months in Lesvos, Athens, Gevgelija, Budapest, Röszke, Belgrade, Eidomeni, Hegyeshalom, Nickelsdorf, Wien, Salzburg, Heiligenkreuz, Zakány, Botovo, Calais, Preševo, Berkasovo, Bregana, Harmica, Trnovec, Mursko Središće, Bapska, Opatovac and a number of other places around Europe.

We have proven that volunteers can do a lot, but we will be unable to keep thousands of people warm once the winter weather closes in.

Winter is coming quickly and we all have just a few days to respond in a humane way.

We call on all European countries to provide immediate help to all those countries affected by the refugee crisis, instead of helping those countries that are building fences.

We call for the building of safe reception and transit centres with facilities that can cope with the harsh winter conditions of the region.

We also call for humanitarian aid to be delivered to the people that need it, for the provision of appropriate medical services and for the coordination of all efforts on a pan-European level.

We also call on the EU to immediately implement other mechanisms which aim to provide safe passage to the EU.

This is advance notice to all of you, the leaders of Europe, that people will be freezing to death soon on our borders if you do not act now.

​We have done our best up to this point and we will continue to help for as long as is necessary.

But now it is your turn, governments of Europe.

Please respond and demonstrate to the world that humanity is still at the core of European values.’

This letter is signed on behalf of these organisations.

The signatories – and the refugees – also need your help.

While all organisations are happy to receive any kind of donation, right now they need more.

Please share this letter and use #europeact

Please call, email or visit your government, your MP, your MEP, your ministers or your president and ask them “What are you going to do to prevent suffering and death among refugees?”

If they don’t answer, or their response is not sufficient, call, email or visit them again. For as long as is necessary.

Thank you.