Friday, September 30, 2016

Women's Views on News

Women's Views on News


Making every woman and girl count

Posted: 29 Sep 2016 02:43 PM PDT

Phumzile Mlambo-Ngcuka, Make Every Woman and Girl count, data collectionUN Women launches flagship programme initiative to collect data about women’s lives.

Building on commitments made in May this year on 21 September, during the 71st session of the United Nations General Assembly, UN Women launched a new public-private partnership called "Making Every Woman and Girl Count".

This 5-year, USD65 million initiative has been set up to close the gender data gaps for Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) monitoring and accountability and build an integrated evidence base that can inform more effective and targeted decision-making.

It is being co-organised with the government of Australia, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the Data2X initiative of the UN Foundation.

It brings together developed and developing countries, multilateral agencies, private foundations and civil society organisations under a new, issue-based "flagship programme", which provides a collaborative and fund-raising framework.

The launch was the first of these programmes, and was directed at ensuring a radical shift in the production, availability, accessibility and use of quality data and statistics on key aspects of gender equality and women's empowerment.

Phumzile Mlambo-Ngcuka, UN Under-Secretary-General and Executive Director of UN Women pointed out that on any given day, it is estimated that globally we produce 2.5 quadrillion bytes of data, yet when it comes to measuring gender equality and the empowerment of women and girls, in both developing and developed countries, we are "data-poor".

There are, Mlambo-Ngcuka said, gaping holes in data for some of the most rudimentary information about women's and girls' lives.

These range from a complete lack of hard facts on how many women and girls live in poverty to biased measures of women's engagement in economic activities that are based on sexist assumptions about women's roles in the household.

Whether as governments or as individuals, she continued: to make sound decisions we need precise and reliable information.

As citizens, we need data on service delivery and government spending to be able to hold our leaders accountable for progress.

Currently, the data gap is so wide that there is adequate information for less than one quarter of the key performance indicators selected to monitor the gender-specific elements of the new Sustainable Development Goals.

When it comes to gender data, the traditional North-South, Developed-Developing and public-private divides no longer hold: very few developed or developing countries can truly claim to have good enough information systems.

This has a direct impact on our ability to quantify an issue and make the right decisions on solutions. For example, we need time-use data in order to understand the extent of women's paid and unpaid work and the challenges they face in balancing the two.

Unpaid care work is a key barrier to women earning a decent living and moving out of a repeating cycle of poverty.

Yet only about half of developed countries have any time-use data since 2000, despite their relatively well-resourced statistical systems.

The cost and complexity of collecting data on these issues is often given as a reason for failure.

Yet, in a world where sufficient data and resources are available to achieve self-driving cars, it seems hard to see why we can't afford navigational aids for society.

Ample evidence exists for the gains to be made from improving gender equality, Mlambo-Ngcuka said: a McKinsey Global Institute report last year indicated that USD12 trillion could be added to global growth by advancing women's equality.

Speaking at the launch, Melinda Gates, co-chair of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, said: "Gender data is foundational to all this work. We can't make good decisions without good data."

When asked about a top priority, Gates said: "I would collect data on women's unpaid care work."

The other Mozart

Posted: 29 Sep 2016 02:12 PM PDT

Nannerl Mozart, Sylvia Milo, The Other Mozart, monodrama, composerThe forgotten story of Mozart's genius sister.

Little Matchstick Factory‘s The Other Mozart is the true, forgotten story of Nannerl Mozart, the sister of Amadeus.

She was a prodigy, keyboard virtuoso and composer, who performed throughout Europe with her brother, to equal acclaim, but her work and her story faded away, lost to history.

Maria Anna – called Marianne and nicknamed Nannerl – was, like her younger brother Amadeus, a child prodigy and when the two were children they toured most of Europe, including an 18-month stay in London in 1764-5, performing together.

There are contemporaneous reviews praising Nannerl, and she was even billed first.

The Augsburger Intelligenz, for example, on 19 May 1763 said ‘Imagine an eleven-year-old girl, performing the most difficult sonatas and concertos of the greatest composers, on the harpsichord or fortepiano, with precision, with incredible lightness, with impeccable taste. It was a source of wonder to many.’

The touring ended when she turned 18; a woman performing and touring risked her reputation, Milo explained.

And so she was left behind in Salzburg, and her father only took Wolfgang on their next journeys around the courts of Europe. She never toured again.

But Wolfgang repeatedly wrote that nobody played his keyboard music as well as she could, and her father Leopold described her as "one of the most skilful players in Europe", with "perfect insight into harmony and modulations" and that she improvises "so successfully that you would be astounded".

The Other Mozart is based on facts, stories and lines pulled directly from the Mozart family’s humorous and heart-breaking letters.

Created by Sylvia Milo, The Other Mozart is a monodrama set in a stunning 18-foot dress designed by Magdalena Dabrowska from the National Theatre of Poland and is directed by Isaac Byrne.

Along with music composed by her famous brother and Marianna Martines, a female composer who inspired Nannerl, original music was written for the play by Nathan Davis and Phyllis Chen, featured composers of Lincoln Center’s Mostly Mozart Festival, BAM and the International Contemporary Ensemble, for the instruments Nannerl knew intimately, such as clavichords, music boxes, and bells, as well as teacups, fans, and other ordinary objects that might have captured her imagination.

A pianist, toy pianist and composer, Chen has been praised by the NYTimes for her "delightful quirkiness matched with interpretive sensitivity".

Chen is one of the founding members of the International Contemporary Ensemble (ICE) and the founder of the UnCaged Toy Piano, a composition competition to further expand the repertoire for toy piano.

Period style movement directed by Janice Orlandi creates a world of opulence and elegance through articulate delicacy of expressive balletic gestures, reverent court bows, and fan language.

With the opulent beauty of the dress and hair design, the sweet smell of perfume, and the clouds of dusting powder rising from the stage, the performance creates a multi-sensual experience and transports the audience into a world of outsized beauty and delight – but also of overwhelming restrictions and prejudice.

There, in communion with the audience, The Other Mozart at last tells her story.

Thursday, September 29, 2016

Women's Views on News

Women's Views on News


Refugee and migrant summits: some results

Posted: 28 Sep 2016 02:14 PM PDT

joint statement on women and girls at migrant summits 2016Women’s groups suggest ways for ensuring the protection and safety of refugee women and girls.

World leaders gathered for two major summits on the global refugee and migration crisis recently. One was the UN Summit for Refugees and Migrants co-chaired by the governments of Jordan and Ireland on 19 September and the other the  Leaders' Summit on Refugees convened by President Obama on 20 September.

Those who met at the United Nations on 19 September adopted what has been called 'the New York Declaration', which expresses their political will to protect the rights of refugees and migrants, to save lives and share responsibility for large movements on a global scale.

As called for in the Declaration, the UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon also launched a new campaign called ‘Together – Respect, Safety and Dignity for All’ to "respond to rising xenophobia and turn fear into hope."

He urged world leaders to join this campaign and "commit together to upholding the rights and dignity of everyone forced by circumstance to flee their homes in search of a better life."

As a Joint Statement on Women and Girls to the Global Refugee and Migrant Summits pointed out, regardless of whether or not they meet the legal definition of refugee, many displaced individuals have been subjected to discrimination, persecution or violence.

The obligation to protect persons fleeing conflict, natural disasters and other difficult circumstances in search of safety and dignity is paramount.

All refugees and migrants, regardless of the reason for their displacement, should be treated with dignity and respect for their fundamental human right, the Statement says.

Women and girls who flee conflict, crisis and natural disasters, as well as women who migrate for other reasons, such as domestic violence or poverty, face specific threats-including human trafficking, exploitation and sexual violence and a denial of their basic human rights, including the right to seek asylum, it continues.

The risks they face can also be compounded by various factors, including age, disability, race and other issues which mean some women and girls face increased discrimination, violence and barriers to assistance and protection.

Assessments conducted in 2015 and 2016 found that current policy and programming trends in response to migration often exacerbate the barriers to safety and legal protection for women and girls.

The joint statement, signed by 42 grassroots women-led civil society organisations, human rights and humanitarian agencies, outlines recommendations for commitments by states attending the Global Refugee and Migrant Summits, to ensure the protection and safety of refugee women and girls.

The recommendations are:

1 – Ensure displaced women and girls meaningfully participate in all aspects of the Summits themselves and follow-up implementation, monitoring and accountability efforts.

2 – Implement safe and legal migration routes, including through expanded family reunification options for refugees, rather than a policy of deterrence. Ensure access to effective asylum and legal protection mechanisms for all migrants.

3 – End the arbitrary and prolonged detention of asylum seekers and migrants. Increase support for alternatives to detention.

4 – Make an explicit, detailed commitment to protect all displaced women and girls from gender-based violence while in transit, in reception centres and upon reaching their destinations.

5 – Expand access for women to legal and safe livelihoods opportunities that leverage their capacity to sustain and protect themselves and their families.

6 – Ensure that all refugee and migrant girls have access to quality, safe and inclusive education at all levels.

7 – Reform gender discriminatory nationality laws to ensure that women and men have equal rights to confer nationality on their children and spouses.

8 – Increase funding and policy support to ensure access to life-saving and comprehensive sexual and reproductive health services.

9 – Provide increased and dedicated funding to displaced women-led civil society organisations, and support policy reforms to enable displaced women to organize themselves and register civil society organisations.

10 – Promote robust and coherent accountability across donor funding for addressing women's participation, gender-based violence, comprehensive sexual and reproductive health and rights, and gender sensitivity.

Click here to read the full statement or to see the list of signatories.

Call for access to safe and legal abortions

Posted: 28 Sep 2016 01:57 PM PDT

28 September, global day of action for access to safe and legal abortion, UN experts, message, support"Unsafe abortion is still killing tens of thousands women around the world" UN rights experts warn.

Speaking ahead of the Global Day of Action for Access to Safe and Legal Abortion, a group of United Nations human rights experts called on States across the world to repeal restrictive abortion laws and policies, and all punitive measures and discriminatory barriers to access safe reproductive health services.

The UN experts are Alda Facio, Chair-Rapporteur of the Working Group on the issue of discrimination against women in law and in practice; Dubravka Šimonović, Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences; Dainius Pūras, Special Rapporteur on the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health; and Juan E. Méndez, Special Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

The experts also expressed their support for the call of several non-governmental organisations to make 28 September an official UN day for safe abortion worldwide, to urge governments to decriminalise abortion and provide reproductive health services in a legal, safe and affordable manner.

"In the twenty-first century unsafe abortion is one of the leading causes of maternal mortality and morbidity.

"According to the World Health Organization (WHO), about 22 million unsafe abortions take place each year worldwide and an estimated 47,000 women die annually from complications resulting from the resort to unsafe practices for termination of pregnancy.

"Criminalisation of abortion and failure to provide adequate access to services for termination of an unwanted pregnancy are forms of discrimination based on sex.

"Restrictive legislation which denies access to safe abortion is one of most damaging ways of instrumentalising women's bodies and a grave violation of women's human rights.

"The consequences for women are severe, with women sometimes paying with their lives.

"Restrictive laws apply to 40 per cent of the world's population.

"In countries which prohibit abortion, women who seek health services in relation to the termination of a pregnancy, whether in order to carry out the termination or to seek medical care after a miscarriage, may be subjected to prosecution and imprisonment.

"Prohibition does not reduce the need and the number of abortions; it merely increases the risks to the health and life of women and girls who resort to unsafe and illegal services.

"Evidence-based comprehensive sex education and the availability of effective contraception are essential to lower the incidence of unintended pregnancy, and hence to lower the number of abortions.

"Indeed, it has been demonstrated that countries where access to information and to modern methods of contraception is easily available and where abortion is legal, have the lowest rates of abortion.

"The possibility of accessing safe abortion remains essential.

"Unwanted pregnancies cannot be totally prevented since no contraceptive method is 100 per cent effective, and women may be exposed to sexual violence.

"We recommend the good practice found in many countries which provide women's access to safe abortion services, on request during the first trimester of pregnancy.

"We insist on international legal requirements that women can access abortion at the very least in cases of risk to their life or health, including mental health, rape, incest and fatal impairment of the foetus during the first trimester and later.

"In this context, states should also allow pregnant girls and adolescents to terminate unwanted pregnancies, which if carried to term expose them to a greatly increased risk to life and health, including a very high probability of suffering from obstetric fistula, prevent completion of their education and obstruct development of their economic and social capabilities.

"We urge States to repeal restrictive laws and policies in relation to abortion, which do not meet the international human rights law requirements and that have discriminatory and public health impacts, and to eliminate all punitive measures and discriminatory barriers to access safe reproductive health services.

"These laws and policies violate women's human right to health and negate their autonomy in decision-making about their own bodies.

"We cannot tolerate the severe violation of women's human rights on the basis of their sex and biological differences.

"We cannot tolerate the high incidence of women's and girls' preventable deaths resulting from maternity-related issues, including from unsafe abortion.

"In the past 30 years, women's rights groups have mobilized on 28 September, named 'the Day of Action for Access to Safe and Legal Abortion', to urge their governments to decriminalise the termination of pregnancy, end the stigma and discrimination around the practice and provide such services in a legal, safe and affordable manner.

"Originally from Latin America and the Caribbean, 28 September, which commemorates the abolition of slavery for children born to slave mothers in Brazil, was renamed as the day of the 'free womb' and the movement spread to all the other regions in the world.

"While slavery has now been abolished, there is still a long way to go before the bodies and wombs of women around the world will stop being instrumentalised in the name of patriarchal morals or traditions and for political, economic or cultural purposes.

"We join our voices to the strong and brave ones of many non-governmental organisations which have called for safe abortion worldwide by requesting that 28 September be made an UN official international day on safe abortion."

Wednesday, September 28, 2016

Women's Views on News

Women's Views on News


Between here and there

Posted: 27 Sep 2016 02:48 PM PDT

bardo, feminist library walk to camden people's theatre, 8 October 2016What is it to walk a line of uncertainty, to experience a bardo?

On 8 October the Feminist Library in London is running an audio walk to rediscover the lost words of women.

Guided by a Librarian and an Open Book the walkers will make their way along the foreshore of the Thames, into the romance of Theatreland, then the history of Bloomsbury.

Surprises, uncertainties, music and stories trace women’s London like never before.

Mirroring the real life, precarious situation at the Library, where its 40 year-old existence is under threat as it faces eviction at the end of October, and change is essential for its survival, Caroline Smith, the first Writer in Residence at the Feminist Library, explores ways in which writing is the starting point for departure, using the notion of the Bardo as a creative strategy.

'Bardo' is a Tibetan word that depicts being in a realm of transition.

Often it is assumed to be undesirable; not for the faint-hearted; full of uncertainty and unrest, suspended between life and death.

But this realm can fuel creativity. It can overturn the old and summon the new. As the past is ruptured, this in-between state can transform old ways of being. The new and the previously unimagined emerge.

Walkers will experience a bardo with a soundtrack of stories and sound, with live intervention in and between the library and the theatre; between archive and black box; between here and there.

Smith is a performer, artist and writer exploring disturbances between self and other, often by creating alter egos who has shown work at the Tate, ICA, Chelsea Theatre, Summerhall for Edinburgh Fringe and her sell-out chat show Louche Women ran at the Poetry Café for two years.

She is now moving towards collaborative, text-based works and B A R D O is part of this direction, working with visual artist Minna Haukka and sound artist Emma Thatcher.

The project is an interconnected audio walk and series of workshops inspired by Smith's residency at the Feminist Library, and explores writing found and created at the Feminist Library in the realm of the Bardo.

The B A R D O audio walk on 8 October starts at 3.15pm at the Feminist Library in Waterloo, and ends at Camden People's Theatre, approximately 3 miles later.

Please book tickets in advance via the Camden People's Theatre website.

This event is part of Calm Down Dear, Camden People's Theatre festival of innovative feminist performance. Browse that full programme here.

Combatting honour-based violence in schools

Posted: 27 Sep 2016 01:23 PM PDT

national schools conference, combatting honour-based violence, 18 October 2016, LondonAll forms of so called honour-based violence are abuse regardless of the motivation.

Youth for Change, IKWRO and Not in my Classroom have joined together to run the very first National Schools' Conference on Combatting "Honour" Based Violence for safeguarding professionals, teachers, school staff and students.

Join them on 18 October at The Winchmore School, London, for a day of training, collaboration and discussion, including workshops delivered by leading experts on FGM, child and forced marriage and so-called ‘honour’ based violence; youth advocacy workshops for students; and a panel session and Q&A with influential representatives from the education sector.

This conference provides an opportunity to ensure all staff understand the wider context of honour-based violence; can spot the warning signs and identify when student might be at risk; and know what steps to take to ensure that at risk students are safe.

Youth for Change will be running a 'Youth Advocacy Workshop' designed to help pupils and students understand and discuss issues of "honour" based violence – including FGM and child, early and forced marriage.

The workshop focusses on enabling pupils and students to find out more about what it means to be a youth advocate and to develop creative strategies for tackling issues they care about.

'Keeping children safe in education', issued by the Department for Education and dated September 2016, says 'So-called 'honour-based' violence (HBV) encompasses crimes which have been committed to protect or defend the honour of the family and/or the community, including Female Genital Mutilation (FGM), forced marriage, and practices such as breast ironing.

'All forms of so called HBV are abuse (regardless of the motivation) and should be handled and escalated as such.

'If in any doubt, staff should speak to the designated safeguarding lead.

‘Professionals in all agencies, and individuals and groups in relevant communities, need to be alert to the possibility of a child being at risk of HBV, or already having suffered HBV.'

And for many of the children at-risk of honour-based violence, school staff will often be their one chance to be safeguarded and supported.

For tickets, or for more information about the National Schools’ Conference on Combatting “Honour” Based Violence, click here.

Saturday, September 24, 2016

Women's Views on News

Women's Views on News


Beyond investing in girls

Posted: 23 Sep 2016 03:10 PM PDT

overseas development institute, beyond the girl, panel discussion‘Empowering girls’ can create a narrow and idealised model of who 'girls' are and what they want.

An array of initiatives has emerged across the development spectrum seeking to empower girls, in response to both concerns about inequitable progress and faith in the social dividends of investing in girls and women.

From the Nike/DFID-funded Girl Effect, to the United Nations Foundation's Girl Up, to the G20's G(irls)20 Summit, organisations in the development community are increasingly focusing on girls as the best catalysts for social change.

On the one hand, it makes sense to empower those who often bear the brunt of development problems.

Yet this approach also assumes that girls have – or can be given – the power to transform their circumstances, and ignores the vast structural impediments to change, over which girls themselves have little influence.

It can also create a narrow and idealised model of who 'girls' are and what they want.

An event organised by the Overseas Development Institute (ODI), an independent think tank on international development and humanitarian issues, took a step back from the rush to invest in girls, to critically engage with questions considering whether this focus is the most effective way to address development challenges impacting girls and women.

‘Delivering change: beyond investing in girls’ was held in the ODI offices in London and streamed live. A panel of speakers presented research on a range of challenges from reducing teenage pregnancy to economic empowerment to violence prevention.

Nikki van der Gaag, director of Gender Justice and Women's Rights, Oxfam GB, chaired the event, and the speakers were Lisa Denney, Sierra Leone Country Manager, Secure Livelihoods Research Consortium, Research Associate, ODI; Shenila Khoja-Moolji, postdoctoral scholar of gender and education focusing on South Asian and Muslim populations, from the University of Pennsylvania; and Dr Natko Gereš MD  Programme Officer with Promundo, who work engaging men and boys to promote gender equality and end violence against women internationally, and Sinead Walsh former Irish Ambassador to Sierra Leone the discussant.

To listen to the panel and the discussion, click here.

Sexist pricing at supermarkets

Posted: 23 Sep 2016 02:50 PM PDT

Fawcett Society, sexist pricing in 4 supermarkets own brands‘We don't just want to see prices reduced, we want sexist pricing practices to end’.

New research just published by the Fawcett Society has revealed that sexist pricing is widespread on our highstreets with the UK's biggest supermarkets – Tesco, ASDA, Sainsbury's and Morrisons – charging women more than men for own brand toiletries and items of clothing.

These products are also often separated in stores, making it harder for consumers to compare prices.

Sexist pricing hit the news earlier this year when campaigner Stevie Wise – successfully – persuaded Boots to change the prices of some of its products.

This recent analysis by the Fawcett Society of a basket of Tesco, ASDA, Sainsbury's and Morrisons' own brand toiletries revealed that products that were gendered, for example with white and pink packaging for women or black and blue for men, were consistently more expensive.

In a basket of own-brand toiletries products, for example, including triple blade disposable razors, shaving cream, spray-on antiperspirant deodorant and body spray, the gap ranged from products costing 22 per cent more in ASDA to a whopping 56 per cent more in Morrisons.

A basket of own brand gendered toiletries costs 56 per cent more for women at Morrisons; 25 per cent more for women at Sainsbury's; 24 per cent more for women at Tesco; and 22 per cent more for women at Asda

Women are paying on average 31 per cent more for an own brand basket of comparable toiletries.

The research also revealed that overall women purchasing clothing are paying 12 per cent more for a basket of own brand clothing items in all the retailers an average of £4.33.

The gender price gap on a basket of clothes was lowest at Asda where women pay 4 per cent (£1) more than men for the basket of comparable items, and the gap was highest at Sainsbury's, where women pay 22 per cent (£9.50) more.

For one item – formal black trousers – researchers found that men were paying more. However, when averaged out across the basket of goods it was still women who were left out of pocket.

In response the Fawcett Society is calling for each of the four supermarkets to carry out a review of their pricing practices, to investigate why products targeted at women consistently cost more and to publish the findings and for an end to sexist pricing in our supermarkets.

The Fawcett Society is also calling for the development of gender neutral options. Although many retailers already offer gender neutral choices the ranges could be developed and extended.

Campaigner Stevie Wise said: “This new research from the Fawcett Society provides a further evidence that women are being ripped off on our high streets.

"Whether it’s toiletries, clothing or high street services, women are being routinely charged more than men for equivalent products and services, and it’s just not good enough.

"We need to get to the bottom of why this is happening, and high street retailers and manufacturers need to start being more honest with consumers, and stop blaming each other for their sexist pricing practices.”

And Sam Smethers, chief executive of the Fawcett Society, said: "The top four supermarkets between them have a 70 per cent market share.

"The majority of their customers will be women. Here we see them consistently charging significantly more for their own brand products which are marketed at women.

"In most cases these are not minor price differences.

"These are big margins.

"We know that women are paid less than men, are targeted with beauty products and advertising and now we see them being charged more.

"The big four have an opportunity here," Smethers pointed out.

"Will they go the extra mile to demonstrate to their female customers that their pricing is fair?

"We don't just want to see one or two prices reduced, we want sexist pricing practices to end."

To read the full report, click here.

Young women still being let down

Posted: 23 Sep 2016 02:39 PM PDT

Young Women's Trust, report, No Country for Young Women, sexism, pay issuesNew survey sheds light on what the government’s priorities should be.

The Young Women's Trust's annual survey for 2016, ‘No Country for Young Women’, has revealed a generation of young people despairing and anxious, many of whose lives are on hold because of serious financial, work and housing problems – and young women hit hardest, and are faced with shocking discrimination.

Three in 10 young women (30 per cent) said they experienced sex discrimination when working or looking for work.

Seven per cent of young women said they were treated less well than others when working or looking for work because they turned down sexual advances.

Forty per cent of BAME young people said they have been discriminated against when working or looking for work because of their ethnicity (compared with 5 per cent White).

And 1 in 12 parents aged 18-30 reported having to use a foodbank to survive.

Drawing on findings from a major poll of 4000 18-30 year-olds carried out by Populus Data Solutions, the survey also showed that low paid, insecure work is a major problem for young people.

Thirty per cent of young people have been offered a zero hours contract – 32 per cent of young women, 28 per cent of young men.

More than 1 in 5 young people (22 per cent) have been paid less than the minimum wage (23 per cent of young women, 20 per cent of young men).

Over a quarter of young people in work (28 per cent) are worried about not having enough paid hours (30 per cent of young women, 26 per cent of young men).

Almost 4 in 10 young people in work (38 per cent) are worried about their job security.

It revealed that young people in work from the lowest socio-economic group DE and from Black, Asian, and minority ethnic (BAME) groups are more likely than others to be worried about their job security (43 per cent DE, 44 per cent BAME) and not having enough paid hours (47 per cent DE, 39 per cent BAME).

And 39 per cent of young women said it was a struggle to make their cash last to the end of the month, while 27 per cent of young women said they are in debt all of the time, and one quarter of 18-30 year-olds had to move back home with their parents because they couldn’t afford to live independently.

The Young Women's Trust wants to see a minister in central government with responsibility for overall youth policy, including employment, and a commitment from the government to extend the 'National Living Wage' to under-25s.

Young people said their top concerns were housing, followed by unemployment and pay/job security.

These, the Trust said, must all be areas of concerted focus by the government.

Tackling the discrimination that many young people are facing because of their age, gender and ethnicity must also be a priority.

Young Women’s Trust aims to support and represent women aged 16-30 struggling to live on low or no pay in England and Wales and who are at risk of being trapped in poverty.

This report is based on the findings from the Young Women's Trust's most comprehensive survey and does not attempt to set out detailed policy solutions, although it does shed light on what the government’s priorities should be.

To read the full report, click here.

Friday, September 23, 2016

Women's Views on News

Women's Views on News


Teenage care leavers risk destitution

Posted: 22 Sep 2016 02:48 PM PDT

The Children's Society, report, care leavers face sanctions and povertyChildren leaving care are being failed by the very people who should be helping them.

Large numbers of young people leaving care are having their benefits stopped, pushing many into debt and destitution, new research has revealed.

The Children's Society's report, The Cost of Being Care-Free, found that 4,000 benefit sanctions have been applied to young people who left care in the last two years, making them at least three times more likely to have their benefits stopped than the general population.

This is leaving them in a desperate situation with no money and unable to afford the basics, including food – and leaves them open to all sorts of risks.

In addition, over 4,000 young people who left care missed out on crucial financial education, as almost half of the local authorities in England are failing to offer young people leaving care financial education and debt advice.

As a result, many do not know how to pay bills, manage their money and can not open a bank account or plan financially for the long-term.

This is leaving these vulnerable young people unprepared for the realities of adult life and puts them at risk of falling into debt and becoming homeless.

Care leavers are eligible for a range of benefits, including Housing Benefit, Jobseeker’s Allowance and Universal Credit, but if they fail to meet benefit regulations, if they are late for a meeting at the job centre or do not update their CV, for example, they can be sanctioned and have – vital – benefits – money – stopped.

And since many do not know that they can challenge these sanctions, they are much less likely than other groups to appeal a decision.

But The Children's Society found that out of the few who did appeal, over 60 per cent of the decisions were overturned, more than for any other group – showing the sanctions were wrongly applied in the first place.

The government has, it says, committed to doing more to support young people leaving care.

But it must make sure that they get the help and support they need in order to claim what they are entitled to and to challenge poor decisions made against them.

And all children in care should also get financial education throughout their childhood, including as they prepare to leave care so they learn how to manage their money.

Matthew Reed, chief executive of The Children's Society, said: "It is unacceptable that children leaving care are being failed by the very people who should be helping them.

"We see from our work the damaging effect this has as care leavers are going without food and other basic necessities because their benefits have been stopped.

"This must change.

"These young people lack the safety net provided by family that most children get as they become adults.

"It is the local authority's responsibility to act as a responsible parent and make sure these children know how to manage their money and are able to live independently as adults.

"Government at every level needs to do more to make sure these young people do not fall into problem debt."

To read the full report, click here.

Tour dates for Make Do and Mend

Posted: 22 Sep 2016 02:26 PM PDT

Make Do and Mend, the women's voices project, County Durham, 2016 tourDomestic abuse is not a woman's problem, it is society's problem.

Changing Relations has been working away on the Women’s Voices Project for the last year and it is now time to snap up your tickets for the tour of 'Make Do and Mend'.

Reflecting on childhood, motherhood and marriage, Make Do and Mend, which has been written and directed by Rachel Adamson, is a powerful production, telling real life stories of women in County Durham who have suffered and survived the trauma of domestic abuse.

Written in verbatim format, it invites the audience to experience first-hand three poignant local stories, in a visually compelling and moving production.

The aim is to help people to recognise what domestic abuse really is; that it is not always physical and or sexual violence, in line with the new law that recognises and criminalises patterns of coercive, controlling and psychologically abusive behaviour, including emotional, psychological, financial pressure.

Changing Relations wants to use the women's voices project as a platform for changing attitudes that stereotypically veer towards asking domestic abuse victims questions such as 'why didn't you leave' to 'how can I help you'.

Audiences have described the group's work as a "Visual and clever representation, an innovative way to communicate and resonate with people."

Feedback from preview performances last year – to audiences in Newcastle and the European Parliament in Brussels – confirmed that this play has value for those affected by Domestic Abuse as an “empowering” reminder “of courage and hope and that there is a way out”.

It is also a valuable reminder that we are all responsible for bringing an end to this insidious crime; 87 per cent of our preview audience said they would be "more likely to offer to help somebody they suspected was experiencing domestic abuse as a result of watching our play".

During Changing Relations's first theatre production, Playing House, performed in 2014, the audience was invited to watch live theatre and dance, share their own stories, and discuss the issues raised with performers and professionals all within the setting of an immersive theatre set based on a home like yours or mine complete with tea and cake at the kitchen table.

We all need to take responsibility in educating ourselves and others on what safe and healthy relationships look like, what domestic abuse is and how to seek or get help when we recognise that it is happening.

Domestic abuse is not a woman's problem, it is society's problem.

To see the tour schedule, click here.

Thursday, September 22, 2016

Women's Views on News

Women's Views on News


Nanas send Queen open letter about fracking

Posted: 21 Sep 2016 01:29 PM PDT

Lancashire Nanas, letter to the Queen, no fracking near BlackpoolAsking: ‘What would you do, Ma’am?’

A group of women who have been opposing Cuadrilla's shale gas plans in Lancashire have sent an open letter to the Queen as part of their long-standing and on-going attempts to prevent fracking near Blackpool.

Lancashire County Council refused planning permission to frack at both sites in June 2015. But Cuadrilla appealed and the government decided it would have the final say after a six-week public inquiry.

The government's announcement on whether fracking should go ahead at Roseacre Wood and Preston New Road is due by 6 October.

In the letter, Tina Rothery, writing to the Queen on behalf of the Lancashire Nanas campaign group, said:

'I am writing this as a fellow grandmother and would ask that you consider my question from your obligation to defend your young and with your heart, rather than your crown.

We are a group of UK citizens who feel increasingly shut out of the decision that is soon to be made on shale gas extraction in Lancashire.

It is a basic tenet of democracy that power should remain as close as possible to the people and not be concentrated in the hands of a few.

We have seen democracy in action in Lancashire, where the people said ‘No’ to fracking and both their borough and county councils agreed with them, and in their turn said ‘No’ to Cuadrilla’s planning applications to frack two sites in rural Fylde, Lancashire [1].

Cuadrilla appealed and a public inquiry was held earlier this year at which we – the residents – spent three weeks giving evidence.

The planning inspector’s report has subsequently been submitted to Sajid Javid MP, the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, who will make a decision at the beginning of October.

The decision to refuse planning permission for fracking in Lancashire was local democracy in action.

However, the government's support for shale means that the power has been passed from Lancashire’s elected representatives to the hands of a few, who are interested in aiding the interests of big business, rather than the interests and health of the residents of Lancashire [2].

This is not democracy.

During the last five years we have spent a considerable amount of time, energy and money pursuing every democratic opening available to us.

We have:

Held public meetings to gauge opinion and share information;

Helped create groups to discuss the hundreds of peer-reviewed studies;

Provided residents' feedback to councillors;

Engaged with and provided MPs with feedback on residents’ concerns about the effects of fracking so close to residential areas;

Engaged with government ministers over residents’ concerns;

Attended industry information events in order to discover/understand their plans and what they might mean for residents;

Created petitions and obtained thousands of signatures which were delivered to County Halls and Downing Street;

Organised and attended peaceful demonstrations locally and nationally;

Took peaceful, direct and non-violent direct action;

Co-operated with NGOs to put pressure on central government;

Given evidence at the House of Lords Economic Affairs Committee on the Economic Impact on UK Energy Policy of Shale Gas and Oil;

Attended and gave evidence at Lancashire County Council Development and Control meetings on Attended and gave evidence at the three-week long Public Inquiry;

Contacted Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government with an invitation to visit proposed sites and meet residents (not accepted); and

Sought help from our Monarch (this action).

We have exhausted every democratic channel. We are desperate.

What would you do, Ma’am?

Yours sincerely,

Tina Rothery, on behalf of the Nanas & Residents from Lancashire

The letter is being followed up with a protest outside Buckingham Palace on 27 September 2016 – with best crockery and best finery in case Her Majesty steps out for a cuppa – starting at 2pm.

Company welcome.

SNP has five answers to UK women’s pension row

Posted: 21 Sep 2016 01:22 PM PDT

Mhairi Back, SNP, pension report, WASPI, 1950s women, 5 proposals, No 10 Downing StreetAnd at a fraction of the cost the UK government has been talking about.

SNP MP Mhairi Black dropped off a copy of the SNP’s recently-launched Pensions Report at No 10 Downing Street this afternoon.

This report, she pointed out, does the government’s job for them, by offering real workable solutions to the injustice that women born in the 1950s face regarding changes to their pensions.

Around 2.6 million women were affected by a change in the law that accelerated the pace of 'equalisation' – raising women's pension age to match that of men – and many will receive their pension several years later than they expected.

Furthermore, due to the UK government's shambolic handling of the notification process many thousands of the women affected by the changes were not been given a reasonable period of time to properly prepare for retirement.

The issue has been widely debated in the House of Commons, and given tremendous support by Mhairi Black, and the Women Against State Pension Inequality (WASPI) campaign groups have worked tirelessly for the introduction of fair transitional measures, but the UK government has refused to act.

The SNP agrees with the equalisation of the state pension age but does not support the unfair manner in which these changes were made in the 2011 Pensions Act.

Women born in the 1950s and affected by these changes are feeling the hardship now and need action taken now – and since the Conservatives refused to act the SNP decided to do the necessary work and find a solution.

The SNP's ensuing independently researched report puts forward five options that would enable the UK government to reverse its mistakes and ensure dignity in retirement for these women.

And the research has found that all this could be done at a fraction of the cost the UK government has been talking about.

For £8 billion – as opposed to the £30 billion predicted by the UK government – we could to return to the original timetable set out in the 1995 Pensions Act – which would go some way to ending the gross injustice served to these women and would help to alleviate pensioner poverty.

Politicians and campaigners already know that the money is to hand, as the National Insurance Fund is projected to have a surplus of £30.7 billion at the end of 2017/18.

The UK government is sitting on this ‘hefty pot‘ and must surely consider using £8 billion to alleviate the plight of the women of the 1950s that the government itself has caused.

And the SNP delivered a copy of this report to 10 Downing Street ahead of the Conservative Party Conference.

The SNP's report models five different reform options for compensating women born in the 1950s who lose out from the accelerated increases in the State Pension Age (SPA) specified in the Pensions Act 2011.

The five different reforms are modelled in the report:

Option 1: Resetting women's pension age to 60

This option would reduce women's SPA back down to 60 – where it was before the increases in pension age in the 1995 Pensions Act began to take effect.

Option 2: Return to the timetable in the 1995 Pensions Act

This option restores the timetable specified in the 1995 Pensions Act (whereby women's SPA rises from 63 in March 2016 to 65 by April 2020, with no further increase to 66 until the mid-2020s).

Option 3: Slow the timetable for increasing women's pension age

This option maintains a rise in women's SPA to 66 but slows down the timetable so that women's SPA rises to 65 by April 2019 (instead of November 2018) to 66 by April 2021 (instead of October 2020).

Option 4: Reduce the qualifying age for Pension Credit to 65 for a transitional period

This option keeps the timetable for increasing women's SPA to 66 as set out in the Pensions Act 2011, but lowers the qualifying age for Pension Credit to 65 for the period from November 2018 to April 2021.

This compensates women aged between 65 and 66 on low incomes who would otherwise be adversely affected by the accelerated timetable for the rise in women's SPA to 66.

Option 5: Allow women affected by the increase in SPA to 66 to receive the State Pension at age 65 on an actuarially fair basis

This option would allow women affected by the accelerated increase in the SPA to claim the State Pension at age 65 but at a slightly lower rate than the full rate of State Pension (around 6 per cent lower if the pension is claimed a year early).

The SNP hopes that this report will not only be welcomed by the UK government but convince them to take action and give these women their proper hard earned pensions and retirement.

It is, as the SNP points out, time for the Conservatives to face up to reality: pensions are not a benefit, they are a contract and the UK government is in the process of breaking that contract. But it can be fixed.

Wednesday, September 21, 2016

Ho Tram - experience, explore, enjoy

View this email in your browser

Welcome to Casino Life

Welcome to Casino Life!
 
And welcome to Las Vegas – at least for some of you.
 
We're particularly pleased to have two Guest Comments to start our issue – from Per Jaldung, chairman of the European Casino Association & CEO, chairman Cosmopol Casinos Sweden and Rick Meitzler, president of Novomatic Americas Sales LLC. We thanks them both for endorsing Casino Life as a vehicle for both operator and manufacturer standpoints.
 
Last month the whole edition focused on the forthcoming show – so for the show edition itself we've predominantly looked elsewhere. It would be easy to focus on the latest bill validator to be launched to an eager showfloor but instead we kick of with Bill Healey chatting to the executive chairman of the Grand Ho Tram in Vietnam -  where kite festivals sit neatly alongside baccarat as part of their truly integrated resort offering.
 
Meanwhile in Malta, until recently there was only one game in town. With Olympic starting their new venture the incumbent casino had to increase their game – and a recent refurbishment has had a dramatic effect. I took time out to talk to operations director Svetlana Buckova and found out more about gaming on the island and how the Dragonara keeps its market share.
 
Also keeping customers happy for many years has been Tom Cantone – the man who changed casino entertainment, interviewed by Steve Karoul. Tom featured heavily in the magazine last year but we've revisited his career to look at how he used the likes of Eddie Murphy to change the way casino resorts worked forever.
 
Peter White stumbled across the debut of a new game called Match 'Em Hi Lo in 2013 so what better time for him to talk to Jim Lemanski, President and Daryl Jendras, Vice President of 3JGaming, about what has happened in the intervening years.
 
Geoff Freeman kindly welcomes you to G2E whilst Marcus Prater reiterates the success that AGEM has had over the past 12 months. Meanwhile Reed extoll just how good the show will be this year – which to be fair they say each year and then promptly the sales staff leave and are replaced in the run up to the next show by a brand new team. I've been to G2E for almost two decades and have lost count of the staff we've had to negotiate our stand with over that time. If you're looking for us by the way we're in the shallow end next to Rubber-TEX "authentic rubber plants for your hotel lobby" and the Acme Shoe Shine team. Please drop by…
 
Finally we close with a focus on some of the highlights you'll see at the show but just before you get there take time to read about the exploits of Vegas Vic … aka Victor H. Royer … who finally gives us (literally) the low-down on his first day in Vegas… from many moons ago.  "Remember today" he was told, and remember it he has – just for you.
 
See you at the show!
 
Glyn Thomas
Editor in Chief

glyn@ace123.com

Visit the website
Copyright © 2016 Ace Publishing Ltd., All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you either opted in at our website, agreed to receive updates from us or kindly handed over a business card at one of the international events we both attend. Or we met in a bar somewhere....

Our mailing address is:
Ace Publishing Ltd.
Clennell, 4 Carriers Place
Blackham
Tunbridge Wells,, Kent TN3 9UQ
United Kingdom

Add us to your address book


Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list

Email Marketing Powered by MailChimp